Ask The Experts About Nanotechnology And Medicine

Nancy asks…
Discuss the promises and perils of science… Any areas i missed? and what can i improve on?
I’ve already thought of a few
PROMISES:: and their counterarguments
1) Medicine/Health – prolongs life/anti-aging
[Stemcells, Genetic engineering/genetics testing, drugs/cures]
-> counter: disregard/endanger/demean lives, playing god/upsetting ecosystem
2) Appreciation of life/counter to religious theories
[Synthetic Biology, Cloning, IVF]
counter-> playing god/upsetting ecosystem
3) Environmental Sustainability
[Alternative fuels e.g. solar, biofuels, etc; Green crops/green revolution, GM food]
-> nuclear energy has potential (-) impact on environment
4) Accelerate economic growth
[IT and communications, Nanotechnology]
-> increases rate of resource depletion
PERILS::
1) Warfare – more deadly
[WMD, nuclear/atomic bombs, biological weapons]
2) Crime
[Cyber crime]
CONCLUSION::
Technology can be used to counter and limit these perils so that benefits of science conferred onto mankind can be maximized. We should thus embrace what science has to offer.
Please help. Thank you

admin answers:
Anything not logically and ethically used by humans could result in negative outcomes. Science is like magic to wizards it depends on the intention of the user. It just exists, it’s neither good nor bad until it is set in motion by the person or person using it. When allowed science and technology can produce solutions for every problem humans face, it’s the way in which we implement these solutions that make the difference. Science should not be feared but respected and understood as what it is, a tool for change either negative or positive.
Sure we could prolong life to thousands of years but the population would swell beyond the carrying capacity of the environment like it already has and would leave no room for evolution, that would be another problem with another solution.
Plus I don’t think there is such thing as playing god and my christian mother agrees, that if god wanted us not to have the ability to do what we do in science he wouldn’t have given us the brain power in which to figure it out. (I’m a spiritualist who believes in the science of evolution, therefore I never take god into account) but for others this is a part of the equation if you will. It boils down to the human experience. We can do great constructive things with science or destructive all the same.
Powered by Yahoo! Answers
Categories: Ask the Experts Tags: Alternative Fuels, Atomic Bombs, Biological Weapons, Carrying Capacity, Counterarguments, Cyber Crime, Economic Growth, Environmental Sustainability, Genetic Engineering, Gm Food, Green Revolution, Medicine Health, Nanotechnology Medicine, Negative Outcomes, Nuclear Energy, Perils, Playing God, Religious Theories, Resource Depletion, Science And Technology